Jan Davis Guitar is spreading a warning to ALL independent music artists, authors, publishers, musicians, bands and groups. How does he know it is the beginning of the end? Jan understands it has begun, and unless an action of God or Congress happens, music hopefuls have little if any chance of rendering it big, or perhaps a little, in the music sector. Go to Rhapsody and read the sign-up Agreements, and Oh yeah, take your attorney with you! You'll find pages upon pages of legal mumbo-jumble. These Agreements that Rhapsody urges the general public to consent to, are 99% on their side. Concerning Rhapsody, which is it, a streaming or a download site? They will have a new member confused, at greatest. Streaming means the general public (or users) can only LISTEN to music. Downloading at Rhapsody means the members pay out a download charge to purchase a song for a quantity determined by Rhapsody, as well as the member's monthly paid subscription charge of $9.99 (rounded off to $10 dollars).

Do the mathematics. One million clients at $10. 120 MIL. That's a significant chunk for using an artist's music as the artist receives less than a penny for a streamed tune. If this bait and change agenda proceeds at Rhapsody, Napster and other streaming sites, will the major 'download just' sites such as for example, iTunes, Amazon among others follow suit? They MAY have to. But, if these large sites change to streaming, the independent artists and others can make virtually nothing at all. That scenario leaves very little incentive for anyone who wants to create and record music. Percentages vary, and these music distributors can generate about 9% of each artist's downloaded track from iTunes, Amazon and various other 'download just' sites. But distributors won't survive on 9% of a streamed track at a cent per music. If this downfall occurs, the independent artist could have NO distribution or delivery technique and if they did, SO WHAT? The existing 'download distribution equals payment' process will dry out, unless laws are made against music streaming.

Where do major (big name) artists stand in the streaming of their music? The band, Metallica, stood up to Napster when their music was provided for free plus they filed a class-action lawsuit. Hats off to them! It is unknown who among major artists remained silent, possibly as the silent ones were booked performing concerts and making big or better dollars than struggling independent artists and bands. Therefore, do these upper-level artists care? Hmm. Once more, money talks. If music streaming proceeds, the downloading industry WILL dry up. After that, where do the independents go to sell their songs and CDs? How about the good old-fashioned radio and record shop scenario? One major reason independent performers and bands stay independent is because major record labels possess refused (or turned down) their items, forcing independents to run out and produce their own CDs and start mailing them out to r / c, hoping to obtain airplay.

This has become a running joke in the music market. Major radio stations prefer to play charted Top 20 songs, 24 hours a day and that is it, while record shops usually won't stock anything new that's not being aired (played) on top r / c, delivered by major record labels. There is not enough room right here to provide all details involved, so these generalities will suffice. Right now, here's the irony of everything. Many record chains, including Tower Information, Wherehouse and even more, have shut down because of Internet downloading and other factors, such as the weak economy, which leads us right back to the top. Independent artists have a chance to level the playing field a little to market their music via the 'download only' sites, but now, music streaming has reared it's ugly head, giving huge profits to Rhapsody, Napster and additional streaming sites who are promoting "Bait and Switch" agendas, while music creators are thrown to the wayside. If the public allows streaming sites to get a foothold, with more music download sites embracing streaming, all artists and bands are affected, especially independent performers, alongside songwriters and their music publishers. Independent artists who may not have regular concert bookings could have virtually nowhere to market their creations, other than out of their car trunks, at weekend gigs for regional pubs, or directly out of their pockets and purses and handbags! This is an extremely serious issue for all involved with music. The public can help by calling, emailing, or writing to their congressmen and females. Get involved. Alert family and friends to make them alert to this impending concern.

LCD vs. LED TVs: They are 2 major types of flat-screen display technology, furthermore to Plasma televisions. Nevertheless, plasmas are now more and more replaced by LEDs which produces same final result as that of Plasma. LED TVs are television sets whose display includes an LCD with light-emitting diodes as a backlight, as opposed to other LCD TVs, which use fluorescent lights for a backlight. Cost: LCD televisions cost less than either LEDs or Plasmas. In case you are cost mindful and wants the HD ready Television without shelling a lot of money, then LCD is the option. What is ideal for your living space: If you are searching for thinner TV full of captivating features, you may want to purchase LED TV.LED TV are thinner than the LCD tvs, consumes minimal electricity, has amazing color reproduction, when compared to an LCD and finally better viewing angles rendering it perfect for your living space. If browse around this site need a tv for the living area, and are on a budget, the LCD is the one to consider. click through the up coming article will work the best in brightly lit areas, with relatively narrow looking at angles and consumes much less electricity than a Plasma TV.